Thursday, September 24, 2009

My Parish Letter

My dear friends in the Parish of Morrisburg – Iroquois – Riverside Heights,

It is with a heavy heart that I report that today I relinquished my license to Bishop John Chapman of the Diocese of Ottawa. This means that as of today I am no longer your rector, nor am I licensed to perform any priestly or diaconal duties within the Anglican Diocese of Ottawa or in the Anglican Church of Canada (ACoC). Instead, I have been licensed as a priest within the Anglican Network in Canada (ANiC). I know that this comes as an enormous shock to most of you, to say the least. I asked Bishop Chapman permission to address the parish this Sunday to explain myself and to say ‘farewell’, but that request was denied. I am not allowed back in the church buildings (except for the rectory, which our family will vacate by Oct 14). So, I thought it best to write this note to help address some of the likely questions that must be emerging as you receive this news.

1) Was I fired?
No. I need to be clear on this. Bishop Chapman did not fire me, nor was I coerced into relinquishment. This was a voluntary act, that I was forced by conscience to make. I could no longer serve under Bishop Chapman’s episcopal oversight, nor alongside so many colleagues who have abandoned the “faith once delivered to the saints” (Jude 1:3). More on those heresies in a moment. This was an agonizing decision that was not taken lightly (though the bishop tells me I need my head examined, literally) and one that I am still pained by. When we came to this parish we came with the full intention of staying long term. We quickly fell in love with this place and with you. But, as we got more involved with diocesan life we were horrified by how far off the rails the bishop and diocesan synod were taking us. Sure there are many within this parish who share those same liberal sentiments, but, nevertheless, my conflict is with the bishop and diocesan synod, not with you.

2) But surely I could have ignored the diocesan “heresies” and simply kept on doing my faithful work in this parish?
No longer. For the nine years that I have served within the ACoC, I’ve watched these heresies eat away at the faithful and add even more confusion to the lost. And this apostasy (i.e. the abandonment of the faith) means ultimately that people are being led away from salvation by a “different gospel...that is not gospel at all” (Gal 1:6-7). I can no longer work within and support an institution that is leading people away from Gospel. Though the local rector has a fair amount of autonomy on what they preach and practice, our episcopal structure binds us to the bishop and the diocese. We are not congregationalists, who can ignore what others are doing, but rather we are episcopalians, who are legally and morally bound tightly together. As a bishop will say in the licensing of a rector, “receive this ministry which is mine and yours.” If I am correct in seeing this bishop as an apostate, then the whole of the diocese is touched by that apostasy.

3) But isn’t this just all about homosexuality?
Not at all. It is unfortunate that much of what the average person hears about the current shakeup within Anglicanism is that it is only about whether “we accept or reject homosexuals.” As a priest, I have never rejected anyone on the basis of their sins. What is at stake is the question of whether homosexuality is a godly lifestyle for Christians to engage in. But even this is not the REAL issue at all, but rather the symptom. The REAL issue is the rejection of the Gospel of repentance, forgiveness, and new life offered in Jesus Christ. It is also a rejection of the authority of the Bible. If the culture deems something as permissible, then the liberal church quickly baptizes it regardless of what the Bible says. But what if the biblical vice lists (e.g. 1Cor 6:9) are, in fact, still valid? That the sins that scripture catalogues (including homosexuality) are the ways in which we are a fallen people who need the grace of salvation and forgiveness in Jesus? Then will we not be inflicting enormous harm by telling people that God is okay with these sins when he really isn't? At the heart of this issue is the question, ‘do we really need a Saviour, or are we mostly okay on our own?’ It seems to me that the bishop and synod of the Diocese of Ottawa have opted for the latter. Where they have gone I can go no longer.

4) Do I think that everyone who remains in the Anglican Church of Canada is apostate?
Absolutely NOT! The Lord alone is judge. I have friends across the country who have chosen to stay and fight for faithfulness within the ACoC. And I know that there are people within this parish who love Jesus passionately and hold the Bible as authoritative. My hope – and the hope of all of us who realign with ANiC – is that the true church, made up of all different brands of faithful Christians, can eventually experience the unity envisioned in Jesus’ high priestly prayer, “Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one” (John 17:11). Certainly not all within the ACoC have bowed the knee to Baal (see 1Kings 19:18; Rom 11:4) yet each of us does need to test the spirits of the churches of which we are members (1Jn 4:1).

5) Have I ceased to be a priest or an Anglican?
Not in the slightest. I relinquished my license, not my ordination as a deacon and priest in the Church of God. Bishop Donald Harvey of the Anglican Network in Canada recognized my holy orders today in writing and therefore my ordination remains valid and I continue to faithfully hold to my vows. As far as being Anglican is concerned, it is argued that between 70-80% of Anglicans worldwide agree with the theological conservatives. As my new Primate, Archbishop Gregory Venables has said, “Far from being dissidents, these people [i.e. in ANiC] are classic Anglicans.”

6) Am I putting my family out on the street by this decision?
No, but thanks for caring about our needs. Though it is hard to leave this parish, we are blessed to have been offered a new position within ANiC that will provide us with a comparable income and a venue to continue to minister. If individuals would like to know more about my new ministry, please email me and I will be glad to chat about it.

In closing, let me say that though this action may seem to say otherwise, I very much do love the people of this parish, and I am going to miss you terribly. Forgive me if it seems a bit over the top to quote Martin Luther here, but his words, when he was on trial for standing up to a church that had lost its way, resonate with me deeply:
Unless you prove to me by Scripture and plain reason that I am wrong, I cannot and will not recant. My conscience is captive to the Word of God. To go against conscience is neither right nor safe. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.

With love and prayers in Christ Jesus,
The Reverend Paul Donison

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please take this in the way that it is intended which is as a serious question. I remember when you got to Ottawa. Back then (< 2 years ago if memory serves me correctly), Ottawa was already heading down that road. It seems strange that for someone who has such strong feelings would willing "enter the lion's den". So, my question is knowing that Ottawa was headed down that road (I knew, and I am only a parishioner), why would you come?

Please do not take offense to the question (hard not to, eh?). You are always welcome here. I just can't figure out why someone so intelligent and committed would do that.

In case you think I am a liberal, I admit I might be. But on this issue, I am only confused. I can not understand how so many holy and educated people can see things so differently. I really don't understand that and hence am stuck in the "I dunno, hmpf, I have other work to do" category.
Thanks.

All the best at St. G's. It's a great and welcoming place.

Po said...

Anonymous,
I don't take offense at your comment. It is a good question.
As a technicality, when I first arrived in 2007 I was blocked transfer by Bp Chapman because he feared I was too conservative. In 2008 he did transfer me when an urgent need to fill a relatively conservative parish emerged -- and since I had not been picketing the synod office in my first year here. So, I arrived with my beliefs clearly displayed.

Also, I knew upon transfer that this diocese was heading down the SSB path, as evidenced by its decision in 2007 at Synod. However (and you may consider me splitting hairs here, but I mean it) the Bishop had not YET given his consent. Many of us believed (wrongly it seems) that at some point cooler heads would prevail, or Canterbury would FINALLY step in and a true moratorium would be enforced in North America. Also, I was not afraid to enter the lion's den for as long as my conscience allowed me to serve as a (hopefully) faithful witness there. However, as I got more and more involved in the inner workings of the diocese (appointed to the Doctrine and Worship Committee) it became clear that the rot had gone much deeper than I had expected. There was no turning that ship around.

Also, in all honesty, I am the first to admit that we are all walking at different paces in how we make these difficult (but, I believe, necessary) decisions to realign. I used to often say that I would get "thrown out" rather than leave. Obviously, as I grew more as a disciple (and as a priest) I came to realize that not to be the case. I worked faithfully within the ACoC for as long as I possibly could without devaluing my conscience. When the Lord called us out, we prayefully responded as we have.

Please feel free to grab me for coffee to discuss this further. REALLY, I am not offended in the slightest.

Peace to you,
Paul+

Edith Humphrey said...

Fr. Paul,
God bless you as you go to serve at St. George. The parish and its people will always have a special place in my heart, and also in the memory of my entire family, though we have moved to ORthodoxy. I appreciate your integrity and your courage. I will pray for you and Fr. David, as well as all my friends in Ottawa.
Yours in Christ,
Edith

Kate said...

Hi Fr. Paul,

Kate from the Essentials blog here. May I print this letter on our blog? Please email me at aecblogers (at) gmail (dot) com.

Welcome to ANiC!

Kate said...

PS - I should say, I've linked to it, but I would like to actually post it....

tomb said...

Hi Paul+,

I understand your reasons and am glad you are not offended. I think we have all felt that way (that we could not support the current ‘regime’ or direction) many times. Taking action is always difficult (especially when it involves moving a young family). I am glad that you are happy with the decision you’ve made and have found a good place to “land”.

As for the coffee offer, sure. How about we delay until November so you can get moved, settled, etc? How can I contact you to set it up?

Tom

Po said...

Thanks for the support folks.

EDITH, I saw you in TO last November for the St Paul's Bloor conference, but we didn't speak face to face. I do look forward to meeting you in person one day.

TOM, please contact the church office to reach me for a time for coffee.

Peace, Paul+

Po said...
This post has been removed by the author.
David said...

Fr. Paul,
God bless you in the stand you have taken.

Rick said...

Hi Paul. I recently used your letter in a study on the 39 articles in one of my parishes. I hope you don't mind. Long time no see/hear/speak.

Po said...

Hi Rick, I glad for my testimony to be used broadly with the appropriate reference. I'm assuming this is Rick Reed serving in Manitoba somewhere, correct? Let me know. Peace brother.

Po said...

above should say "I'm glad"...not enough coffee this morning...not to mention that it is MOVING DAY!! Pray for us.